1.1 Explain the relationship between identity, self-image and self-esteem, and the impact on an individual’s wellbeing
The concepts of identity, self-image, and self-esteem profoundly influence an individual’s wellbeing, especially in the context of those accessing care and support services.
To begin with, identity encompasses the broader understanding of how individuals perceive their roles in society—the characteristics and affiliations that confer to one’s social identification (Festinger, 1954).
Self-image is slightly more focused; it pertains to how we see ourselves, which can be influenced by both our internal dispositions and external feedback (Cooley, 1902).
Meanwhile, self-esteem involves the evaluative aspect of our self-concept: essentially, whether we feel worthy or unworthy based on this constructed image.
Wellbeing, as referred to within care contexts under the principles laid out by the Care Act 2014, leverages these identities and perceptions. Particularly through factors like maintaining personal dignity and ensuring involvement in societal functions—points that rely heavily on a person’s perception of themselves (Department of Health & Social Care UK Government, 2014). For example, someone who has a positive self-image and high self-esteem is likely to participate more actively in social activities or make crucial decisions regarding their health.
Consequently, if an individual perceives themselves negatively (a fractured self-image) or feels low esteem—even if temporarily due to life transitions such as ageing or disease—it can severely disrupt these aspects. They may withdraw from social participation or express diminutive control over their life choices pertaining to healthcare. Hagger & Chatzisarantis (2005) highlight a direct linkage between these perceptions and physical health outcomes, emphasising just how intertwined mental evaluation processes are with physiological well-being.
Furthermore, matters escalate when considering scenarios involving abuse or neglect; where damages inflicted upon identity could perpetuate issues around worthiness – making ‘control over day-to-day life’ seem even loftier for affected individuals. Besides physical effects – mental trauma fluctuates emotional balance tilting scales further away from what empirically constitutes wellness.
To bolster well-being, especially within sensitive populations found in support frameworks – continual reinforcement towards strengthening self-concept constructs becomes crucial—a duty not only meriting existential recognition but demanding dedicated sociocultural interventions.
Other answers in the full document:
- 1.2 Explain how a range of factors have a positive and negative influence on individuals’ wellbeing
- 1.3 Describe how to access a range of services and resources available to support individuals’ wellbeing
- 1.4 Explain how an individual’s wellbeing may affect their behaviours and relationships
- 2.1 Explain how to engage and involve individuals in monitoring their own health and wellbeing
- 2.2 Describe early indicators of physical and mental health deterioration
- 2.3 Describe how and who to escalate concerns about an individual’s health deterioration
- 3.1 Engage and involve individuals in understanding and monitoring their health and wellbeing
- 3.2 Demonstrate use of appropriate tools to monitor and report changes in health and wellbeing
- 3.3 Record observations of health and wellbeing and take appropriate action
- 4.1 Support an individual in a way that promotes their sense of identity, self-image and self-esteem
- 4.2 Demonstrate ways to contribute to an environment that promotes wellbeing
- 4.3 Apply person-centred approaches when working with individuals and others to improve health and wellbeing