AC M1 Promote communication in care settings

1.1 Identify the different reasons people communicate

Expressing Needs and Wishes

In adult care settings, communication serves as the fundamental channel for individuals to express their needs and wishes. The ability to voice discomfort, desires for social interaction, or require medical attention is essential. For instance, a resident feeling unwell can notify caregivers who can then provide the necessary support (Argyle, 2013).

Building Relationships

Moreover, communication is vital for building relationships between service users and staff members. It contributes to forming bonds of trust and understanding that are crucial in any caregiving environment. By sharing personal stories or participating in social activities together, both parties can create a friendly atmosphere which promotes well-being (Peplau, 1991).

Making Decisions

Effective dialogue allows for collaborative decision-making processes regarding care plans or daily routines. Engaging clients in conversations about their preferences enables them to have a sense of control over their lives despite being in care (Barry & Edgman-Levitan, 2012).

Ensuring Safety

Safety within care settings is also underpinned by clear communication practices; it includes the transmission of critical information about risks or emergencies to safeguard everyone present. Ensuring that instructions are delivered clearly prevents accidents and misunderstandings (Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations [JCAHO], 2002).

Adopting these communicative practices guarantees not only the meeting of basic requirements but also enhances the quality of life for individuals under adult care.

1.2 Explain how communication affects relationships in the work setting

Effective communication is a critical component of adult care settings, significantly influencing relationships between staff and those receiving care. It serves as the bridge conveying information, needs, and emotions. Leading care professionals acknowledge that good communication fosters trust, which is essential for developing strong relationships within any care facility (Berry & Miralles Cots, 2017).

Clear and consistent communication prevents misunderstandings that can lead to tension or conflict in the workplace. When workers articulate themselves clearly and actively listen to others—including service users—the risk of errors is drastically reduced, enhancing individual safety. The importance of accurate transmission of service user information cannot be overstated; this has been repeatedly shown to be pivotal in delivering high-quality care (Manojlovich & DeCicco, 2007).

Teamwork is essential for effective care outcomes. A well-coordinated team relies on clear communication to coordinate its efforts seamlessly. For example, articulate shift reports between care workers ensure continuity of care without compromising the service user’s condition due to miscommunication.

Furthermore, emotional intelligence plays a vital role as practitioners navigate the sensitive situations common in adult care environments. Empathetic communication often helps de-escalate tense situations and promotes understanding between caregiver and recipient (Goleman, Boyatzis & McKee 2013).

However, in this digital age, technology has transformed communication within care settings. Email updates about policies or procedures save time but require careful attention to avoid conveying an unintended tone (Miller et al., 2019).

Effective communication impacts every aspect of working dynamics in adult care facilities, from ensuring accurate exchange of information about individuals’ health needs to maintaining staff morale by fostering mutual respect through mindful interactions. This is an undeniable truth that should not be overlooked.

1.3 Explain how communication skills can be used to manage complex, sensitive, abusive and difficult situations

In the sensitive setting of adult care, communication skills are a requirement for managing complex situations. These interactions often involve delicate topics and high emotions that, without careful navigation, could escalate into conflict or distress.

The use of active listening is critical. By attentively engaging with an individual’s concerns, caregivers can grasp not just the verbal message but also non-verbal cues like tone and body language (Burke, 2017). Active listening establishes a foundation of respect and trust—essential in defusing tension.

Moreover, empathy plays a vital role. Conveying genuine understanding helps to validate an individual’s feelings (Miller & Rollnick, 2013). In instances where adults may feel undermined due to their age or situation, showing empathy empowers them and promotes more cooperative interactions.

Furthermore, clear and concise communication reduces misunderstandings that could lead to abrasive scenarios (Kourkouta & Papathanasiou, 2014). This approach involves simplifying explanations without diminishing an individual’s dignity—balancing simplicity with respect ensures clarity without condescension.

Lastly, managing difficult behaviours may require de-escalation techniques, such as speaking calmly or allowing space for individuals to express themselves without judgment. Herein lies the skill of balancing one’s assertiveness with patience; not overpowering the conversation but confidently steering it towards calmer waters (Health Education England, n.d.).

Effective communication in adult care hinges on being attentive listeners, empathetic allies, clear conveyers of information, and judiciously diffusing tense encounters—all intended to uphold the dignity and well-being of those under care.

1.4 Explain the importance of maintaining open and honest communication

Clear, honest communication is the basis of successful interactions between caregivers and those they care for. According to Miller (2018), such openness is not merely beneficial but also critical in cultivating a trusting relationship – a fundamental element that supports all aspects of quality care.

When carers engage in straightforward conversations, they gain better insights into the individual needs and preferences of their clients. This allows for tailored care plans that specifically address each person’s unique requirements.

The impact on emotional well-being cannot be understated either. Research by Hildon et al. (2009) indicates that when individuals feel heard and understood within their care environments, it bolsters their feelings of self-worth – an aspect integral to high-quality care.

Moreover, transparent communication plays a crucial role in reducing errors. Geschwind (2021) highlights how clarity in conversation can prevent misunderstandings about treatment or care directives, thereby enhancing safety for those receiving assistance.

Open channels also pave the way for constructive feedback; as noted by the World Health Organization (2021), this ensures that any concerns regarding personal well-being can be raised and addressed promptly by adults in receipt of support services.

Promoting direct and reliable exchanges sets solid foundations for adult caregiving strategies where safety is reinforced, respect for personal dignity maintained, autonomy supported, and overall contentment among clients elevated – underlining its extensive influence on every angle of adult-focused supportive services.

2.1 Describe the range of communication styles, methods and skills available

Verbal Communication

Verbal communication involves the spoken or written word. When speaking, our voice, tone, pitch, and word choice significantly convey our message. Verbal skills encompass both speaking and effective writing (Greene & Burleson, 2003). For example, a well-crafted email can resolve issues that a poorly worded one might exacerbate.

Non-verbal Communication

Non-verbal communication includes often overlooked but essential elements, such as body language (posture and facial expressions), proximity (how close we stand to someone), eye contact, touch, gestures (like nodding), and overall behaviour, which can sometimes convey meanings more powerfully than words (Pease & Pease, 2004). These cues provide context and emotional depth to conversations.

Additional Forms of Communication

In addition to these basic forms, signs, symbols, and pictures can bypass linguistic barriers. Physical objects of reference can serve as anchors for certain concepts. Face-to-face interactions remain fundamental, whether physically present or online.

Phone calls still hold their place alongside newer channels such as emails, letters, reports, and text messages. The digital revolution has provided new avenues for connection across vast distances, such as social media networks (Baron, 2008).

Critical Communication Skills

With this array of methods at our disposal, a suite of skills is essential for effective communication:

• Active Listening Skills: Paraphrasing, summarizing, and reframing information enhance clarity.
• Appropriate Interpretation of Non-verbal Signs: Enriches understanding beyond mere words.
• Tactful Use of Silence: Gives others space to process thoughts, an often overlooked but powerful aspect (Klann-Gabrielsson & Rystedt, 2016).

In every act of communication, multi-layered components come into play. For instance, eye contact can be interpreted as affirmation or aggression depending on the culture. Similarly, choosing an emoji in a text message requires careful consideration to accurately capture intent. As communicators, blending verbal prowess with non-verbal finesse ensures that messages are not only sent but also received accurately and empathetically.

2.2 Explain how people may use and/or interpret communication methods and styles in different ways

In adult care, the way people use and interpret communication is both vital and diverse. Nonverbal cues, such as gestures or facial expressions, often play a central role (Birdwhistell, 1970). Individuals may interpret a smile not just as happiness, but as an expression of satisfaction with care received. Similarly, care providers utilise touch; a caring hand on the shoulder can be calming and convey empathy (Hertenstein et al., 2006).

Moreover, verbal communication is subject to varying interpretations. The choice of words, tone, pitch, and even silence carry significance (Roter & Hall, 2006). A calm tone might put an anxious resident at ease; however, the same placid manner could be misunderstood by another individual as disinterest.

In addition to spoken or unspoken interactions, written communication is also paramount. Usage of easy-to-read language in signage and instructions assists individuals who might struggle with complex medical jargon (Mayer & Moreno, 2003).

The impact of cultural background cannot be discounted when considering communication in adult care settings. People from different backgrounds may have distinct expectations regarding personal space or acceptable ways to express concerns (Leininger & McFarland, 2002).

Through all these layers of interaction, it’s clear that no single method suits everyone. Awareness and adaptability are key for caregivers communicating within adult care environments.

2.3 Describe the factors to consider when promoting effective communication

In adult care settings, communication is a significant pillar for ensuring both the well-being of individuals and the smooth functioning of services. Clarity is essential; whether it’s through spoken, written, or non-verbal messages, conveying information unambiguously helps prevent misunderstandings (Fletcher, 2007). The language employed should be straightforward and jargon-free to foster understanding regardless of the listener’s cognitive abilities or education level.

Another crucial factor is empathy. Effective communicators must skilfully interpret emotional cues and respond with sensitivity (Kaplan et al., 2010). An understanding tone holds particular importance in difficult conversations about health concerns or personal issues in adult care.

Additionally, consider cultural competence: Adult care professionals encounter diverse populations. It’s vital to recognise cultural variations that influence communication styles and preferences (Purnell & Paulanka, 2008). Being knowledgeable about cultural norms can enhance interactions and provide a more individualised approach to care.

Also, one must not overlook the physical environment as part of effective communication – minimising background noise ensures that auditory messages are received without interference. Adjusting lighting can also aid those who rely on visual cues such as lip-reading or sign language.

2.4 Describe how digital and other technologies can be used to promote and enhance

communication between self and others

In today’s interconnected world, digital and other technologies stand at the forefront of communication enhancement. With an array of tools at our disposal, connecting with individuals accessing care services, family members, colleagues, and the broader community has never been more dynamic.

Email and messaging apps speed up the exchange of information. They permit swift responses to queries from carers or managers (Barrett et al., 2012). The immediate nature of these applications facilitates prompt decision-making and efficient problem-solving.

Secondly, video conferencing platforms like Zoom have revolutionised face-to-face meetings. They allow for real-time interaction with loved ones or professionals from other services regardless of geographical barriers (Gupta & Brooks, 2021). This not only makes communication more personal but also helps in building stronger bonds between the parties involved.

Also, social media serves to bridge gaps between workers in care settings and community members. Platforms such as Facebook groups can offer support networks for carers or volunteers while providing a stream of updates on health guidelines or events (Smith et al., 2015).

In addition, project management tools—think Trello or Asana—are brilliant for team-wide coordination. These platforms enable workers to track tasks effectively and communicate progress with peers or supervisors without cluttering inboxes (Johnson & Johnson, 2019).

2.5 Identify the barriers that may be present when communicating with others

Communication in adult care is a crucial skill. Though not always straightforward, various barriers may arise, complicating effective exchanges between caregivers and those they support.

Firstly, environmental factors can prove disruptive. Noisy settings or poorly lit rooms might make it difficult for individuals to understand each other (Hargie, O., 2016). Likewise, limited time constraints dialogues; rushed interactions often lead to misunderstandings or overlooked concerns (VitalTalk, 2021).

An individual’s physical state can also be a barrier. For example, physical health issues such as hearing loss or speech impairments hinder clear communication (Murphy, J., 2017). The emotional and psychological state cannot be ignored either – for both the carer and care receiver. High levels of stress or mental health challenges may cloud one’s ability to express thoughts clearly or interpret messages accurately (The National Institute on Aging, n.d.).

Furthermore, personal abilities come into play as well. A lack of skills or confidence may deter individuals from initiating conversations or articulating their needs effectively.

Sadly, preconceived notions and prejudices also create divides. It’s not uncommon for biases based on ageism or cultural differences to impede open dialogue (Wachtel & Bratteteig, 2020).

Additionally, when conflicts arise without resolution strategies at hand, things get even harder – feelings can become barriers themselves.

Another interesting consideration involves therapeutic activities used in care settings – like art therapy or remedial games – which, while immensely beneficial at times, might sometimes inadvertently interfere with direct communication if not facilitated sensitively (Older People’s Commissioner for Wales, 2019).

Finally, assistance during therapies like physiotherapy must account for tailored communication styles since feedback from service users requires clear understanding to ensure efficacy and comfort.

2.6 Explain how to access extra support or services to enable effective communication with and between individuals

Efficient communication is vital and sometimes requires extra support or services to be truly effective. It’s not difficult to see why; caregivers need to ensure that clear, accurate information is exchanged between all parties, including individuals with varying communication needs.

Translation Services:

First up are translation services. Imagine this scenario: an elderly person who speaks only Russian is trying to express their needs to a caregiver who does not understand their language. That’s where translation services come into play. They bridge the language divide and make sure everyone gets the message loud and clear (Pöchhacker, 2016).

Interpretation Services:

Where translation handles written word, interpretation services tackle spoken language barriers. Important in real-time scenarios such as medical appointments or care planning meetings, interpreters can also culturally contextualise information, which aids in deeper understanding (Angelelli, 2004).

Speech and Language Services:

For individuals struggling with speech due to conditions like aphasia or following a stroke, speech and language therapists are indispensable. These professionals assess and treat speech difficulties, providing tailored strategies to improve communication abilities (Duchan & Patel, 2012).

Advocacy Services:

Lastly, but no less crucial, are advocacy services. Advocates can be the voice for those who struggle or cannot communicate their wishes themselves. They play a key role in making sure an individual’s rights are respected and that they’re involved in decisions about their care (Bateman et al., 2019).

We caregivers should always have information on hand about accessing these vital supports, readily available for immediate use when needed.

2.7 Describe the impact of poor or inappropriate communication practices

Communication underpins the success and harmony of any relationship, whether personal or professional. Poor communication practices can profoundly affect workplace dynamics, interpersonal relations, and overall productivity. Consider, for instance, how patronising individuals can erode self-esteem and stifle productive exchanges (Northouse, 2018). This act of talking down to someone not only belittles them but also impairs trust—key in mutual interactions.

Further complicating matters is the habit of not listening. Active listening is essential, as Gulati (2020) highlights: it validates individuals’ concerns and fosters a supportive environment. Conversely, ignoring someone communicates disinterest and disrespect, which can lead to conflicts or disillusionment.

Lack of Effective Timing: Not making time to communicate effectively suggests that others’ insights are undervalued. Time constraints shouldn’t eclipse the need for meaningful dialogue.

Also, there’s a need to honour everyone’s communication preferences; disregarding them indicates insensitivity toward cultural diversity or personal needs and strengths (Krauss & Fussell, 1996). Furthermore:

Misusing Communication Skills: When communication skills manipulate or monopolise an interaction rather than facilitate mutual understanding.

Interruptions during conversations clearly convey a lack of respect for others’ contributions (Tannen, 1993), while providing unsought advice might cross boundaries into areas where autonomy should be respected.

Pacifying Responses: Attempting to placate may superficially soothe tension but ultimately dismisses genuine grievances. Thus, such actions undermine the development of robust solutions.

In essence, each flawed practice damages relationships—the very foundation on which society operates.

5.1 Explain the purpose and principles of independent advocacy

Independent advocacy serves to champion the rights and interests of individuals, especially those within adult care who may face difficulties speaking out for themselves. This purpose is grounded in the principles of autonomy and justice; it seeks to empower individuals by giving them a voice when they might otherwise be unheard (Dalrymple & Boylan, 2013).

In adult care settings, advocates work to ensure that adults receive fair treatment and have their preferences respected. Reports like “Speaking up for Advocacy,” published by Action for Advocacy (2008), highlight advocacy as vital in providing an external support network, guiding adults through complex services such as healthcare or legal matters.

Several principles define the practice of independent advocacy:

• Empowerment: Ensuring that service users gain control over their own lives is key (Atkinson et al., 2003).
• Rights-Based Approach: An advocate upholds the individual’s rights, aligning with legislation like the Human Rights Act 1998.
• Representation: Reflecting the individual’s views without influence from personal judgments or external policy pressures is paramount.
• Confidentiality: All communications must remain private unless consent is given or if it concerns safety implications.

A study conducted by MacLeod et al. (2017) reinforces these principles, citing real-world scenarios where increased independence dramatically improved life quality for clients in adult care.

Independent advocacy transcends mere representation—it embodies a commitment to dignity and respect for each individual while navigating systems that can often seem daunting. By adhering to these principles, advocates provide invaluable support, enabling individuals in adult care environments to live fuller and more equitable lives.

5.2 Identify when to offer support to individuals to access an advocate

Providing support to individuals in adult care is crucial, especially when it comes to accessing an advocate. As caregivers and social workers, we must be tuned into specific scenarios indicating when this type of support is not only beneficial but also necessary. Let’s dive into these conditions.

Communications Challenges: When an individual faces difficulty expressing their needs and concerns effectively or struggles with understanding complex information about their care or rights, advocating for a supporting voice becomes essential (Schmidt & Lawrence, 2015). This might include those who have hearing impairments, cognitive disabilities, or language barriers.

Decision-making Situations: At times when critical decisions regarding health care treatments or living arrangements are being made, offering support to access an advocate can ensure that the individual’s preferences and interests are heard and respected (Rodriguez et al., 2017). Vulnerable adults deserve a helping hand in navigating these pivotal conversations.

Protection of Rights: In circumstances where there’s a risk of abuse, neglect or exploitation, bringing in external advocacy can provide additional layers of protection for an individual. Research has shown that advocates play a significant role in safeguarding at-risk adults (Clark et al., 2018).

Complaints and Grievances Process: Whenever someone under adult care is dissatisfied with aspects of their service provision and wishes to raise formal complaints, suggesting the assistance of an advocate can help amplify their voice within bureaucratic processes (Wolfe et al., 2016).

By keeping a keen eye out for these instances and responding appropriately as professionals, we ensure that every individual receives the respect and representation they rightfully deserve.

5.3 Describe how to support individuals to access advocacy services

To effectively support individuals in adult care to access advocacy services, a concrete understanding of the process is paramount. Accessing Advocacy Services begins with identifying the appropriate advocacy service that aligns with the individual’s needs (Adams et al., 2007). Advocates serve as vital links between the person requiring assistance and their rights and entitlements.

To provide adequate support, we first must:

• Identify Needs: Examine what type of advocacy is required—this could be general, health-based, or legal advocacy.
• Information Sharing: Furnish individuals with understandable information about what advocates do and how they can assist (Morgan & Yoder, 2012). Leaflets or web sources from reputable organisations such as Age UK can often be useful.
• Contact Details: Supply clear contact details of relevant local advocacy services; this might include phone numbers or email addresses.

We should promote self-advocacy by encouraging individuals to express their own interests and concerns but stand ready to intervene if direct support is necessary. This intervention may involve helping them initiate contact with an advocate or facilitating meetings between the individual and the advocate.

It’s also crucial to practice sensitivity to cultural, linguistic, or disability-related barriers that might hamper an individual’s ability to access these services independently. For example, arranging interpretative services where language impediments exist can dismantle communication obstacles (Henderson & Pochinok, 2014).

Finally, documentation and follow-up are key components in this supportive journey. Monitoring progress ensures continuity of care and that any issues encountered in accessing advocacy are addressed promptly (Dalrymple & Boylan, 2013).

By adhering closely to these guidelines, professional roles in adult care ensure empowered engagement between clients and necessary advocacy resources.

6.1 Explain the meaning of the term ‘confidentiality’

Confidentiality refers to the ethical and legal duty that compels care professionals to keep personal information private. In the adult care sector, this means service user or client details should not be shared without consent, unless required by law (Data Protection Act, 2018). The concept is crucial for trust between the caregiver and the individual receiving care.

Understanding Consent and Privacy

Service users entrust health professionals with sensitive information, believing it will remain confidential. As per the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) enforced within the the Data Protection Act, explicit consent must often be acquired before sharing one’s data (Information Commissioner’s Office [ICO], n.d.).

Security of Information

Care settings take several measures to ensure confidentiality. This involves safeguarding records – both digital and physical – via secure systems (NHS Digital, n.d.) and staff training on policies like the Health and Social Care Act 2012.

Legal Repercussions and Ethical Implications

Breaching confidentiality could lead to legal consequences under the laws; furthermore, it betrays ethical codes outlined by entities like the Nursing & Midwifery Council (NMC), potentially damaging professional reputation (NMC, 2018).

Ensuring Confidentiality

Ensuring stringent adherence to rules of confidentiality champions dignity and respect in adult care environments. Service users depend on caregivers’ discretion concerning their medical conditions or challenges they face in everyday life. Therefore, a nuanced understanding of what confidentiality entails is indispensable for anyone working within care professions.

6.2 Explain why it is important to maintain confidentiality when communicating with others

Its significance cannot be overstated, as maintaining confidentiality ensures trust between caregivers and recipients, respects privacy rights and adheres to legal requirements.

Trust

Firstly, trust forms the bedrock on which caregiver and client relationships are constructed. When individuals seek care, they bring with them sensitive personal information that they intend to be safeguarded (Mental Health Foundation, 2016). Breaching this expectation can erode the very trust that enables effective communication and care provision. Gershon (1999) emphasises that “the bond of confidentiality” acts as a silent agreement assuring clients their disclosures are protected.

Privacy Rights

Respecting privacy rights is as central as providing health services themselves. According to Beauchamp & Childress (2001), who framed key biomedical ethics principles, individuals possess an innate right to control information pertaining to themselves. In adult care settings, where vulnerability may already be an issue, respecting privacy serves as affirmation of each person’s autonomy and dignity.

Legal Requirements

There is also an undeniable legal side – statutes require strict compliance with confidentiality norms. For instance, the Data Protection Act mandates safeguarding personal health information in the United Kingdom. Failure not only betrays trust but could lead caregivers into legal troubles or sanctions.

In practice, maintaining confidentiality aligns everyone involved in adult care towards a common goal – valuing each individual’s personal history while mitigating risks associated with unauthorised data exposure.

Robust practices around confidentiality affirm the professional integrity required within adult care communications; without it, we risk undermining both our ethical obligations and potential therapeutic outcomes.

6.3 Give examples of when and why confidentiality may need to be breached

When caring for adults, confidentiality is not just a courtesy; it’s critical. However, there are instances where the cover of confidentiality must be lifted for the greater good.

Protecting Against Harm

One primary reason for breaching confidentiality involves preventing harm. If an adult is in danger or poses a risk to others, care providers may need to disclose information (NHS Code of Practice on Confidentiality, 2014). For instance, if a client with dementia wanders off and gets lost, their location and medical condition might need to be shared with search teams and even the public to ensure their safe return.

Legal Requirements

Sometimes the law steps in. There are legal scenarios where professionals must report information (The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [HIPAA], 1996). Examples include court orders or when regulatory requirements necessitate reporting certain diseases.

Informing Families

At times, particularly in emergencies where consent cannot be obtained, informing family members could become necessary. When doing so helps with care decisions or ensures support systems are in place (Trusted Choice Network).

Public Health Concerns

Imagine an outbreak of a contagious disease within a care home; this situation may warrant disclosing patient specifics to public health authorities. It’s done not out of malice but as part of efforts to manage and stem the spread of infection (“Guidance on confidentiality in NHS”, 2003).

While we value keeping matters in confidence, exceptional circumstances call for transparency – not as a betrayal but as benevolence aiming to protect individuals and society at large. Confiding such sensitive data isn’t done lightly; it happens because sometimes sharing is genuinely caring.

6.4 Describe the potential tension between maintaining an individual’s confidentiality and disclosing concerns.

In adult care settings, maintaining an individual’s confidentiality is both a legal obligation and a basis of trust. Yet, there are moments when the cover of privacy must be lifted for the greater good, especially when concerns about an individual’s safety or well-being arise. Such scenarios present potential tension: we uphold confidentiality to respect personal information (Data Protection Act, 2018) yet must disclose concerns to protect the adult from harm (The Care Act, 2014).

Firstly, it’s crucial to recognise that every person has the right to expect their personal data will be treated with utmost respect and discretion. This principle is enshrined in legislation and further bolstered by professional codes of conduct (General Social Care Council, 2002). But what happens when keeping that information confidential could lead to neglect or abuse?

This dilemma often requires professionals to weigh the imminent risk against the duty of confidence. For instance, if an at-risk adult shares details indicative of abuse but pleads for secrecy, care workers are faced with a difficult decision: respecting wishes can mean leaving them vulnerable; conversely, disclosure might feel like betrayal but could prevent substantial harm.

Careful consideration and judgement are essential—informed by guidance such as Making Safeguarding Personal (Local Government Association & Association of Directors of Adult Social Services, adss.org.uk). Before breaking confidentiality, one must explore all avenues—can consent be obtained? Is there a less intrusive means to ensure safety? Each case demands its unique balance point between privacy and protection.

Ultimately, disclosures should always be proportionate and necessary—shared only with relevant parties who need this knowledge to intervene effectively (Health & Care Professions Council Standards of Conduct Performance & Ethics, hcpc-uk.org). The crux lies in judiciously deciding when breaching confidentiality is justified for safeguarding reasons—a vital part of upholding individuals’ dignity while promoting their welfare.

Reference

• Argyle, M. (2013). The Psychology of Interpersonal Behaviour. Penguin UK.
• Barry, M.J., & Edgman-Levitan S. (2012). Shared Decision Making — The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(9), 780-781.
• Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations [JCAHO]. (2002). Health Care at the Crossroads: Strategies for Addressing the Evolving Nursing Crisis.
• Peplau H.E.(1991). Interpersonal Relations in Nursing: A Conceptual Frame of Reference for Psychodynamic Nursing. Springer Publishing Company.
• Berry R.A.W., & Miralles Cots M.P., (2017). The Impact of Communication in Healthcare. International Journal of Health Science.
• Goleman D., Boyatzis R.E., & McKee A., (2013). Primal Leadership: Unleashing the Power of Emotional Intelligence. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Manojlovich M., & DeCicco B., (2007). Healthy Work Environments: Problems And Solutions In The Acute Care Setting. In Hughes R.G.(Ed.), Patient Safety And Quality: An Evidence-based Handbook For Nurses [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency For Healthcare Research And Quality (US); Chapter 33.
• Miller K.K., et al.,(2019). The use of Electronic Health Records: Communication Patterns In Outpatient Encounters. Journal Of Medical Internet Research, doi:10.2196/jmir.header2
• Burke R., (2017) Communication Skills for Nursing Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Miller W.R., Rollnick S., (2013) Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change, Guilford Press.
• Kourkouta L., Papathanasiou I.V., (2014) Communication in Nursing Practice. Materia Socio Medica, 26(1), 65–67.
• Health Education England . Managing Challenging Conversations. Retrieved from https://www.hee.nhs.uk/
• Baron, N. S. (2008). Always on: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford University Press.
• Greene J.O., & Burleson B.R., eds. (2003). Handbook of Communication And Social Interaction Skills. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
• Klann-Gabrielsson A., & Rystedt H. L.. (2016) ‘Talking about tactile experiences.’ Sage Publications.
• Pease A., & Pease B.. (2004). The Definitive Book of Body Language. Bantam Books .
• Birdwhistell R.L. (1970) Kinesics and Context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Hertenstein M.J., Verkamp J.M., Kerestes A.M., Holmes R.M. (2006). The communicative functions of touch in humans, nonhuman primates, and rats: A review and synthesis of the empirical research. Genetic Social General Psychology Monographs, 132(1), 5-94.
• Roter D.L., Hall J.A. (2006). Doctors Talking With Patients/Patients Talking With Doctors: Improving Communication in Medical Visits (2nd ed.). Westport: Praeger Publishers.
• Mayer R.E., Moreno R. (2003). Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.
• Leininger M.M., McFarland M.R.(2002) Transcultural Nursing: Concepts/Theories/Research & Practice (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing.
• Fletcher, C. L. (2007). Clear Communication Principles. London: Sage Publications.
• Kaplan-Myrth N., Myrick F., & Farrell S.G., (2010) ‘Healthcare Provider-patient Communication: A Satisfaction Study’, Journal of Nursing Scholarly Practice,4(2).
• Purnell L.D., & Paulanka B.J. (2008). Guide to Culturally Competent Health Care. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company.
• Barrett, A., Linsley P., & Williams B. (Eds.). (2012). Communication in Clinical Handover: Improving the Safety Qualities. Oxford University Press.
• Gupta K. R., & Brooks H. L. (2021). Remote Work Revolution: Succeeding from Anywhere. Harper Business.
• Smith M.L., Austin W.B., & Greenfield D.N.(Eds.).(2015). CyberPsychology: The Psychology of Digital Spaces. Springer Verlag GmbH
• Johnson D.A., Johnson R.B.(2019).Integrative Approaches to Project Coordination.Organizational Dynamics, 48(4),12-21
• Angelelli, C.V. (2004). Medical interpreting and cross-cultural communication. Cambridge University Press.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Gulati R., Mayo A.J., Nohria N., HBR’s 10 Must Reads on Teams with bonus article “The Discipline Of Teams” by Jon R. Katzenbach And Douglas K Smith(2020)
• Krauss R.M & Fussell S.R.(1996) Social psychological models of interpersonal communication. Social Psychology handbook of basic principles.
• Dalrymple, J., & Boylan, J. (2013). Effective Advocacy in Social Work. SAGE Publications.
• Atkinson, D., Gwynne-JonesypeonH., & Hurrion E. (2003). Speak Out – Lend Your Voice: Independence and Wellbeing through Partnerships with Independent Advocates. Passmore Edwards Foundation.
• Speaking up for Advocacy (2008). Action for Advocacy.
• MacLeod, A., Stewart A., McCusker P. E., & Forbat L. (2017). The Role of Living Well with Dignity: The Contribution of Family Carers’ Experiences to Policies about End-of-Life Care on Scottish Islands.” Scottish Affairs, 26(2), 211–234.
• Adams R., Dominelli L., Payne M., Social Work: Themes Issues And Critical Debates, Palgrave Macmillan; 2007.
• Morgan S.K., Yoder L.H., A Concept Analysis Of Person-Centered Care Journal Of Holistic Nursing, Vol 30(1), March; 2012:6–15.
• Henderson S., Pochinok N.B,, Health Informatics Series Eds.; Falls Church VA USA HIMSS Publications; Second Edition October ;2014
• Dalrymple J., Boylan J., Effective Advocacy In Social Work, Sage Publications Ltd.