Task 1 of 1
Report
Examine the concept of professional supervision in practice.
Instructions:
1. Evaluate theories and models that underpin the practice of professional supervision
The act of guiding and managing workers in a professional setting is known as professional supervision. It entails providing advice, support, and guidance to employees to ensure that they are performing their duties in accordance with their job description and meeting established standards of practice. Supervision enables practitioners to achieve the best possible results by ensuring they perform at the required level (Bradley et al., 2001).
Professional supervision has grown in popularity in recent years as a result of increased demand for accountability and quality assurance in professions such as teaching, social work, and health care, where service users require safe and high-quality care that meets relevant standards. This growth has resulted in the development of numerous theories that provide practitioners with frameworks for understanding how supervisees can benefit from their supervisory relationship while assisting them in providing an effective service; these theories include developmental models, scaffolding approaches, integrative models, and solution-focused methods, among others.
Developmental models emphasise the development of capacities both personally (i.e. self-awareness) and professionally (such as reflectiveness). They aim to assist supervisees in exploring personal values so that any underlying motivations for current behaviour can be identified, leading to purposeful action that is tailored accordingly. Schon, who argued that supervisors should encourage reflective conversation between practitioner and client so that individual values and beliefs can be explored, and Gibbs, who proposed a more structured approach focusing on the identification of development needs using a competency framework, have been prominent proponents.
Scaffolding is defined as “the gradual release of responsibility to learners as they demonstrate their readiness to advance up the ladder” (Fisher and Frey, 2013). This approach assists supervisees in learning new skills, with supervisors providing only what is required while being responsible for managing any risks or pitfalls that may arise. The primary focus is not only on instruction but also on assisting supervisees in achieving mastery through opportunities for practice and reflection. Vygotsky was a prominent proponent of scaffolding theory, which focuses on the role of teachers in guiding students toward increasingly complex tasks based on their levels of understanding (Wood, Bruner & Ross, 1976). In the context of health and social care, scaffolding theory can be applied to the practice of professional supervision, with the supervisor guiding the professional towards increasingly complex tasks and responsibilities based on their levels of knowledge and understanding. This approach can be particularly useful in helping professionals who are new to their field or who are facing challenging situations, as it provides a structured and supportive way to develop their skills and confidence. By gradually increasing the complexity of tasks and responsibilities, the supervisor can help the professional to develop their skills and knowledge in a way that is both challenging and supportive.
Integrative models promote an appreciation for diversity in supervision by promoting systems-thinking approaches that investigate contextual dynamics both inside and outside organisations when working with clients; these include political, social, economic, and legal factors, among others, arguing that these frequently impede progress and must be addressed if high-quality provision is to be expected (Bradley et al., 2001). In this sense, practitioners are encouraged to foster mutual respect in the supervisor/supervisee relationship by utilising organisational knowledge when making decisions and solving problems. Bannon (2001) proposed a systemic approach to supervision in which the interaction between members of any organisation should be given priority while recognising that everything is interconnected.
Solution-focused Model emphasises both current realities and future possibilities, with practitioners encouraged not to speculate about past events but rather to aim for desired outcomes by asking supervisees questions such as “What would it look like if this issue was resolved?” Rather than focusing solely on deficits, the emphasis is placed on exploring strengths and resources available to help achieve these goals. Prominent proponents include Zemke et al. (2002), who propose that supervisors use solution-based conversations to help supervisees gain the confidence they need to take action; DeShazer and Berg 1989 described their belief that supervised practices should shift from ‘problem talk’ to ‘possibility language’.
Integrative models emphasise a more holistic view of supervision by encouraging practitioners to consider the larger context and systemic structures that impact clients. Supervisors, according to proponents such as Bannon (2001), should consider political, economic, social, and legal factors when making decisions in order to ensure interventions are effective and appropriate for their specific setting. Furthermore, Rogers (1997) advocated for the incorporation of various models into practice plans, with psychodynamic approaches used as needed. By taking this approach, supervisees gain an appreciation for different perspectives, which leads to a more collaborative approach when addressing client issues, ultimately assisting them in providing high-quality service delivery that meets established standards. In contrast to other theories discussed above, this approach also encourages supervisees to recognise their role in creating the broader context, enabling them to take responsibility for the environment they work in.
In conclusion, all theories discussed above demonstrate how they can provide valuable insights into the practice of professional supervision by enabling workers to understand better why they may need support/guidance as well as what approach is most suited when delivering services. Professional supervision enables practitioners to improve the quality of their service while meeting governing body standards, and these theories can provide a framework for understanding how to do so. Supervisors can create a more meaningful environment in which supervisees feel both supported and accountable by combining elements from each theory.
2. Explain the legal and regulatory codes of practice that relate to professional supervision
Professional supervision is a process that assists individuals in developing the skills, knowledge, and attitudes required to provide professional services. It promotes and facilitates the development of individual practitioners as well as teams in terms of practice and self-management, ensuring high standards within any given organisation or service. Supervision should be considered an essential component of personal development for any professional practitioner who provides support, guidance, and training to others.
The legal framework for professional supervision relates to legislation and codes of practice that defines what is expected from practitioners in the way they manage their practices. It can include civil liability, criminal law, contract law and workplace health and safety regulations. It also involves professional ethics standards, which form a part of various regulatory bodies’ Codes of Conduct or Ethics for those who are providing supervised services, such as social workers, counsellors etc. (Corey et al., 2018). It is important to note that these regulations are constantly changing and evolving as new legislation is introduced.
The Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care (PSA) is responsible for overseeing the implementation of the Health and Social Care Act (2008). The PSA has developed a set of standards for professional supervision, which outline the expectations for professionals who are providing supervision to others in the healthcare and social care fields. These standards include:
- Ensuring that supervision is provided in a safe and supportive environment
- Ensuring that supervision is regular, reflective, and focused on the needs of the supervisee
- Providing supervision that is appropriate to the level of experience and competence of the supervisee
- Ensuring that supervision is carried out in accordance with any relevant codes of conduct or professional standards
- Ensuring that supervision is consistent with the professional values and ethical principles of the supervising profession
In order to help individuals manage their care and support needs as they age, the UK has enacted the Care Act (2014). It establishes a legal framework for the assessment, management, and delivery of adult social care services in England, including activities related to supervision and safeguarding, which outlines the duties of both local authorities and professionals employed by them in terms of managing risks associated with mistreatment.
Regulation 23 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 explicitly addresses an organisation’s duty when determining whether it is capable of providing safe, effective care: ‘The registered provider must take steps that are necessary to provide safe, effective health care treatment, etc.’ The key point here is that employers must assess suitability through proper procedures/practices; such assessments would necessarily require adequate clinical supervision, among other things, to be put in place prior to any member’s acceptance into the team they supervise; thus, this regulation effectively provides authority within its scope by outlining essential requirements over how competent staff members can operate safely.
This is echoed by governing bodies such as The Care Quality Commission (CQC) in their Fundamental Standards, which was released in April 2020 and include statutory guidance on ‘Supporting effective clinical supervision.’ Outcome 14 specifies the obligations of registered providers and those working for them with regard to risk-assessing individual service users who may be vulnerable or have complex needs and taking steps necessary, so far as reasonably practicable, to protect them from abuse or neglect. This also applies to personnel supervising others’ activities, either formally or informally, for example, acting supervisors, team leaders, and so on.
Managers and supervisors must ensure that all team members are appropriately trained and qualified and are kept up to date with any changes related to the services they offer. This should be supported by adequate supervision during performance reviews conducted at regular intervals for safety, compliance, and other purposes. The regulator has issued a statement for health and social care organisations that covers the criteria for achieving best practices in a modern society where resources may be limited. Particular emphasis has been placed on supervisory roles to ensure that safe and effective care is delivered by all parties involved.
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) also recommends that employers provide suitable and sufficient training, support and supervision for those carrying out duties to ensure the health, safety and welfare of workers. This includes ensuring there is appropriate access to professional supervision where necessary.
The Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 places duties on employers to protect the health, safety and welfare of employees at work. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 stipulates that employers must make arrangements for managing health and safety risks through adequate supervision by competent people.
While the legal framework is changing to meet the needs of modern society, professional supervision still remains a key component in ensuring compliance with relevant legislation and regulations, as well as providing effective support for staff. Supervisors should have appropriate knowledge of current guidance and practice frameworks in order to be able to provide informed advice on any issues raised by team members or service users. Furthermore, they must also ensure that practitioners under their supervision remain up-to-date on training requirements associated with their roles/responsibilities within an organisation.
It is, therefore, clear that professional supervision should be considered an essential component in any organisation or service providing healthcare services, social care support or training/mentoring activities. It can help practitioners develop their skills while helping them stay accountable to a high standard of practice expected from regulated professionals, all whilst ensuring the safe delivery of these services within any given context.
3. Explain how evidence-based practice informs professional supervision
Evidence-based practice is a decision-making approach that emphasises the use of the best available evidence in conjunction with clinical expertise and patient values. It is a crucial concept in a variety of fields, including healthcare, education, and social work, because it enables professionals to make informed decisions about how to provide the most effective and appropriate care or support to their clients (Rolfe et al. 2001).
Evidence-based practice can help to inform professional supervision in a variety of ways. To start with, it can assist professionals and their supervisors in identifying and implementing the most effective strategies and interventions to support professional development and improve the quality of care or support provided. Professionals can be more confident that their interventions are based on the best available evidence and are likely to be effective if they rely on research and evidence rather than anecdotal or experiential knowledge alone.
The use of evidence-based supervision models or approaches is one way that evidence-based practice can inform professional supervision. These models have been founded on research and evidence about which approaches are most effective in fostering professional development and improving the quality of care or support provided. For example, the Clinical Supervision Competency Model and the Clinical Supervision Self-Assessment Tool are two evidence-based supervision models explicitly developed for use in the healthcare field (Falender et al, 2014). These models provide supervisors with guidance and support in assisting professionals in identifying areas for improvement and developing strategies to address them.
Another way that evidence-based practice can influence professional supervision is by providing a framework for assessing the efficacy of supervision interventions. Professionals and their supervisors can assess whether their interventions have the desired effects and make necessary adjustments by using research and evidence to guide their decision-making. They may, for example, use evaluation tools or instruments to assess the effectiveness of their supervision interventions and compare them to research-based benchmarks.
Professional supervision can also be informed by evidence-based practice because it allows professionals to stay up to date on the latest research and best practices in their field. Professionals can ensure that they are using the most current and effective strategies and interventions by incorporating evidence-based knowledge into their supervision process. This is especially important in fields like health and social care, where research and best practices are constantly evolving.
Evidence-based practice can be a valuable tool in professional supervision, assisting professionals and their supervisors in identifying and implementing the most effective strategies and interventions to support professional development and improve the quality of care or support provided. Professionals can be more confident that they are making informed and evidence-based decisions that will have a positive impact on their practice if they incorporate evidence-based knowledge into their supervision process.
Additionally, evidence-based practice can help to promote transparency and accountability in professional supervision. By relying on research and evidence to inform decisions and interventions, professionals and their supervisors can be more transparent about their decision-making process and the reasoning behind their actions. This can help to build trust and confidence with clients and other stakeholders, as they can see that the care or support being provided is based on the best available evidence.
Furthermore, evidence-based practice can help to reduce bias and subjectivity in professional supervision. Through informed decisions, professionals and their supervisors can minimise the influence of personal beliefs or biases on their practice. This can lead to more objective and unbiased decision-making, which is essential in ensuring that clients receive fair and unbiased care or support.
While evidence-based practice can be a valuable tool in professional supervision, it is important to remember that research and evidence are only part of the decision-making process. Professionals and their supervisors should also consider other factors, such as clinical expertise and patient values, when making decisions about how to best provide care or support. Ultimately, professionals need to make informed decisions based on all available information – not just research findings – in order to ensure that they are providing the most effective and appropriate care or support possible. Also, it is important to remember that research and evidence are constantly evolving, so professionals need to stay up to date on the latest developments in their field.
In conclusion, evidence-based practice is a crucial concept in professional supervision, as it helps professionals and their supervisors to make informed and evidence-based decisions about how to provide the most effective and appropriate care or support to their clients. By relying on research and evidence to inform their practice, professionals can be more confident that their interventions are likely to be effective and can reduce bias and subjectivity in their decision-making. Additionally, evidence-based practice can help to promote transparency and accountability in professional supervision, building trust and confidence with clients and stakeholders.
Task 2 of 2
Essay
With reference to a health and social care organisation of your choice, explore their approach to and use of professional supervision. Your essay should:
1. Explain how to overcome power-imbalance in professional supervision
A critical aspect of professional supervision is the possibility of a power imbalance between the supervisor and the supervisee. This can be due to personal power dynamics, such as the supervisor having more knowledge, skills, or experience, or organisational power dynamics, such as the supervisor having more authority or control within the organisation. It is essential to consider and address power imbalances in order to ensure that the supervision process is effective and equitable.
Being aware of and actively managing personal power dynamics is one way to overcome power imbalances in professional supervision. This can include the supervisor being open to feedback and learning from the supervisee, and being transparent about their own knowledge, skills, and experience. It may also entail the supervisee being proactive in seeking out opportunities to learn and grow, as well as taking responsibility for their own development.
The supervision process can also be influenced by organisational power dynamics. For example, the supervisor may have more reward power, which means they can give the supervisee rewards or incentives. This can lead to a power imbalance because the supervisee may feel obligated to please the supervisor in order to receive these benefits. To address this, the supervisor should be clear about their expectations and provide constructive feedback rather than using rewards as a motivational tool.
Furthermore, the supervisor may have coercive power, which means they have the authority to punish or discipline the supervisee if certain expectations are not met. This may result in a power imbalance and an unhealthy power dynamic. Instead of using punishment or discipline as a means of motivation, the supervisor must be clear about their expectations and offer encouraging and constructive feedback to address this.
The supervisor may have legitimate power, which means they have the authority and credibility to make organisational decisions. As a result, the supervisee may feel pressured to conform to the supervisor’s decisions, resulting in a power imbalance. To address this, the supervisor must be open to input and feedback from the supervisee, as well as involve the supervisee in decision-making processes.
To create a healthy, effective, and equitable supervision process, the supervisor and the supervisee must be aware of and actively manage power imbalances. Healthcare and social care organisations can ensure that their professionals have the support and guidance they need to provide high-quality care to their patients and clients by recognising and addressing these power dynamics.
2. Explain how to agree the boundaries and parameters for carrying out supervision with the supervisee
Agreeing on the boundaries and parameters for carrying out professional supervision is an important step in establishing a healthy and effective supervision relationship. Some key elements to consider when agreeing on these boundaries and parameters include:
Confidentiality: It is essential to establish clear guidelines for confidentiality in order to ensure that the supervisee feels safe to share sensitive or personal information during supervision. This may include agreeing on who will have access to the supervision materials and discussions, as well as what information can be shared outside of the supervision process.
Professional boundaries: Establishing clear professional boundaries is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the supervision relationship and ensuring that the supervisee feels comfortable and safe. This may include agreeing on appropriate topics of discussion, as well as any physical or emotional boundaries that should be respected.
Roles and accountability: Clarifying the roles and responsibilities of both the supervisor and the supervisee in the supervision process is essential. This may include agreeing on the goals and objectives of supervision, as well as any specific tasks or actions that the supervisee should be working on.
Time and location: It is crucial to agree on a regular schedule for supervision sessions, as well as a suitable location for the sessions to take place. This includes considering the availability and preferences of both the supervisor and the supervisee.
Evidence: Agreeing on the types of evidence the supervisee may present during supervision can be helpful, whether case studies, progress reports, or self-reflection exercises. It is also important to discuss any preparation the supervisee should do before supervision sessions, such as reviewing materials or completing specific tasks.
Communication: Establishing clear lines of communication between the supervisor and the supervisee is important in order to ensure that the supervision process is effective and supportive. Agreeing on the preferred method of communication (e.g., in-person, phone, email), as well as establishing a schedule for regular check-ins or progress updates, are all part of this.
By establishing clear boundaries and parameters for professional supervision, healthcare and social care organisations can ensure that the supervision process is effective, supportive, and respectful for all involved. This can help practitioners to feel supported in their work and to provide high-quality care to their patients and clients.
3. Describe how to provide constructive feedback to the supervisee
Providing constructive feedback to a supervisee is a critical aspect of professional supervision. It helps the supervisee to identify areas for improvement, learn from their experiences, and develop their skills and knowledge.
One key aspect of providing constructive feedback is to focus on specific behaviours or actions rather than making general or personal attacks. This means avoiding statements like “you’re not doing your job well” and instead stating something like “the report you submitted had several typos, and the formatting was not consistent with the guidelines. Next time, please be sure to proofread and follow the formatting guidelines.”
It is also essential to provide both positive praise and constructive feedback. This can help to build the supervisee’s confidence and motivation while also helping them to identify areas for improvement.
It can be helpful to provide feedback in a timely manner, as it allows the supervisee to address any issues or concerns more quickly. It is also essential to provide feedback in a private setting, as this can help the supervisee to feel more comfortable and open to receiving feedback.
It is also important to be open to feedback from the supervisee. This can help to create a more collaborative and supportive supervision relationship and can also help the supervisor to identify areas for improvement in their practice.
Providing constructive feedback to a supervisee is a critical aspect of professional supervision. By focusing on specific behaviours or actions, providing both positive praise and constructive feedback, and being open to feedback from the supervisee, healthcare and social care organisations can help their professionals to develop their skills and knowledge and provide high-quality care to their patients and clients.
4. Explain how to review and agree performance targets
Reviewing and agreeing on performance targets is an essential aspect of staff development in healthcare and social care organisations. It helps to ensure that staff have clear goals and objectives to work towards and that their performance is being regularly assessed and reviewed.
One way to review and agree on performance targets is through the use of staff appraisals. Staff appraisals are periodic evaluations of an employee’s performance, skills, and development needs. They typically involve a formal meeting between the employee and their supervisor or manager, during which the employee’s progress is reviewed and discussed.
The employee’s performance in their current role and any goals or objectives that have been established should be discussed with their supervisor during a staff appraisal. Employees should be given the opportunity to provide feedback on their performance as well as to discuss any challenges or concerns they may have.
The employee and their supervisor should then agree on performance goals for the upcoming period based on the discussion. These objectives must be specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART). A performance goal, for example, could be to “improve patient satisfaction scores by 10% over the next six months by implementing a new patient feedback system.”
Setting and reviewing performance goals requires active participation from both the employee and the supervisor. This helps to ensure that the goals are realistic and attainable and that the employee has the necessary support and resources to achieve them.
Reviewing and agreeing on performance targets is an essential aspect of staff development in healthcare and social care organisations. By using staff appraisals to review and discuss performance and by setting SMART performance targets, organisations can help their staff to develop their skills and knowledge and provide high-quality care to their patients and clients.
5. Explain how to use tools to gather feedback on own professional supervision practice
As a health and social care professional, gathering feedback on my own professional supervision is an important part of my practice. There are a few different tools that I can use to do this:
Surveys: I may use online surveys to gather feedback from the people I work with, such as clients, colleagues, and supervisors. This can be an efficient way to gather a large amount of feedback in a short period of time.
Interviews: Conducting one-on-one interviews with people I work with to gather more in-depth feedback on my supervision practices is also a strategy I employ. This is usually a good option if I want to get more detailed or specific feedback.
Focus groups: Facilitating a focus group with a small group of people I work with to discuss my supervision practices and gather feedback also works, as it can be a good way to get a variety of perspectives and ideas.
Self-assessment: I can also take some time to reflect on my own supervision practices and consider how they could be improved. This can be done through self-assessment tools or simply by setting aside time to reflect on my own practices.
Observations: Asking a colleague or supervisor to observe me during a supervision session and provide feedback afterwards also provides valuable insights. This is a good way to get objective feedback on my communication style, problem-solving skills, and other aspects of my supervision practice.
Peer feedback: I can also ask my colleagues for feedback on my supervision practices. This can be a good way to get perspectives from people who work with me regularly and have a good understanding of my strengths and areas for improvement.
Client feedback: It is particularly helpful to gather feedback from the clients I work with, as they are the primary beneficiaries of my supervision. This may be done by asking clients for feedback directly or by asking a supervisor or other professional to gather feedback on my behalf.
Anonymous feedback: If I am concerned that people may not feel comfortable giving me honest feedback directly, I can set up an anonymous feedback system, such as a suggestion box or an online form. This can encourage people to share their thoughts and ideas without fear of retribution.
I often keep in mind to be open and receptive to all feedback, even if it is difficult to hear. It can be challenging to receive criticism, but it is an integral part of learning and growing professionally. By actively seeking out and incorporating feedback, I can continually improve my supervision practice and better serve the people I work with.
6. Describe how to reflect on feedback to identify changes to be made to own practice
As a health and social care professional, it is important for me to reflect on feedback in order to identify any changes that need to be made to my own practice. Here is a process I usually follow to do this:
Review the feedback: I start by carefully reviewing all of the feedback I have received from the staff. This might include feedback from surveys, interviews, focus groups, or other sources. I usually make a list of the specific points that have been raised and consider how they relate to my own practice.
Consider my goals: I think about my goals as a supervisor and how the feedback relates to these goals. For example, if my goal is to create a supportive and collaborative work environment, I can consider how the feedback I have received aligns with this goal.
Reflect on my practice: Once I have a clear understanding of the feedback and how it relates to my goals, I will take some time to reflect on my own practice. This might involve considering how my supervision style or methods could be adjusted better to meet the needs of my staff or clients.
Measure my performance: I will also measure my performance against relevant standards or guidelines to ensure that I am meeting the expectations of my profession by reviewing professional standards or reviewing feedback from other sources, such as clients or supervisors.
Make changes: Based on my reflection and measurement of my performance, it becomes easier to identify any changes that need to be made to my practice. This could entail making minor adjustments to my supervision style or methods, or it might involve implementing more significant changes.
By following this process, I can effectively use feedback from staff to identify changes that need to be made to my own practice and continually improve my supervision skills.
Reference:
- Bradley, L. J., Gould, L. J., & Parr, G. D. (2001). Supervision-based integrative models of counselor supervision.
- Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). What is scaffolding. Teachers’ voices, 8, 8-16.
- O’Bannon, G. (2001). Managing our future: The generation X factor. Public personnel management, 30(1), 95-110.
- Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak, B. (2013). Generations at work: Managing the clash of Boomers, Gen Xers, and Gen Yers in the workplace. Amacom.
- O’Bannon, G. (2001). Managing Our Future: The Generation X Factor. Public Personnel Management, 30(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600103000109
- Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L., & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team leadership. The leadership quarterly, 12(4), 451-483.
- Zaleznik, A. (1992). Managers and leaders: are they different?. Harvard Business Review, 70(2), 126-135.
- Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology press.
- Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Bmj, 312(7023), 71-72.
- Titler, M. G. (2008). The evidence for evidence-based practice implementation. Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses.
- Ciliska, D. (2005). Educating for evidence-based practice. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21(6), 345-350.
- Rolfe, G., Freshwater, D., & Jasper, M. (2001). Critical reflection for nursing and the helping professions a user’s guide.
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.
- Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2014). Clinical supervision: The state of the art. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(11), 1030-1041.
- Beddoe, L. (2010). Surveillance or reflection: Professional supervision in ‘the risk society’. British journal of social work, 40(4), 1279-1296.
- Johns, C. (1993). Professional supervision. Journal of Nursing Management, 1(1), 9-18.
- O’Donoghue, K., & Tsui, M. S. (2012). Towards a professional supervision culture: The development of social work supervision in Aotearoa New Zealand. International Social Work, 55(1), 5-28.
- Effective supervision in a variety of settings – Guide (2017). [ONLINE] Available at: https://www.scie.org.uk/publications/guides/guide50/.
- Field, R. (2017). Effective Leadership, Management and Supervision in Health and Social Care (Post-Qualifying Social Work Practice Series). Learning Matters.
- Hawkins, P. and Shohet, R. (2012) Supervision in the Helping Professions (Supervision in Context). London. Oxford University Press
