Home » Assessments » Health and Social Care » Level 3 Diploma in Adult Care » Unit 7: Promote Person-centred Approaches in Care Settings

Unit 7: Promote Person-centred Approaches in Care Settings

Level: Level 3 Diploma

1.1 Explain how and why person-centred values must influence all aspects of health and adult care work.

Person-centred values are fundamental to health and adult care work, as they focus on individual needs, preferences and rights. When these values are upheld in healthcare delivery, it results in beneficial outcomes for both the person receiving care and the caregiver alike.

For those being cared for, a tailored approach based on person-centred principles can lead to improved physical or mental health along with increased feelings of autonomy and dignity due to the recognition that they know best about their own requirements. Furthermore, this leads towards higher satisfaction levels among individuals who receive such attention.

Those giving the actual care also gain from working under these guidelines – job fulfilment is heightened through building meaningful relationships with patients, which enables them to make a positive difference in people’s lives. Moreover, an environment built upon respect between caregivers & recipients ensures more efficient collaboration and communication.

In order for personnel delivering care and treatment to understand what makes every single case unique, efforts must be made consistently when taking into account opinions expressed by those being cared for and being able to adjust practices to meet changing needs. Additionally, consideration should be given towards cultural and personal preferences, which help foster a feeling of security whilst maintaining individual autonomy.

Person-centred values are essential in health and adult care work as they enable staff to provide effective, compassionate care tailored uniquely around the requirements of every person receiving attention. With this approach, physical, mental and emotional well-being can be supported successfully by integrating such ideals into each area concerning medical intervention or general support.

1.2 Evaluate the use of care plans in applying person-centred values.

Care plans are an invaluable asset when aiming to apply person-centred values to care, as they provide a way to consider the individual’s needs and preferences comprehensively. These documents can outline physical, mental and emotional aspects of care for individuals, which ensures that each action taken is tailored specifically towards them. In addition, it creates transparency among caregivers regarding roles and responsibilities in providing quality, consistent treatment across all stakeholders involved.

When incorporating such methods, though, it is essential that autonomy and dignity be considered at every turn, with flexibility incorporated when necessary or desired by those receiving aid. Consequently, regular reviews should take place, so these carefully crafted strategies continue matching personal objectives over time with precision and accuracy.

Moreover, using these practical resources successfully not only does it enable teamwork amongst different parties but also encourages cooperation between professionals while reinforcing confident reliability within people given support who require personalised assistance best suited to their needs and wants.

Therefore, care plans prove to be a beneficial tool when establishing person-centred values through offering an organised system of evaluation that helps adapt help towards the user in question.

1.3 Explain how to collate and analyse feedback to support the delivery of person-centred care in line with roles and responsibilities.

Analysing and gathering feedback is essential for fulfilling responsibilities related to providing person-centred care. Feedback can be a useful tool in discovering the requirements, likes, and experiences of those receiving the care while also pointing out areas that need improvement when it comes to offering quality treatment. Here are some steps caregivers should take in order to effectively collect and evaluate feedback:

First off, it’s necessary to define what kind of information is being looked for (i.e. communication, decision making, physical comfort, etc.) as well as who will provide this data (person being cared for/family members or other carers). Afterwards, caregivers can begin developing a plan about how these answers will be collected, such as through surveys, interviews etc., whilst considering their service user’s needs at all times; plus taking into account all potential participants by keeping an open approach throughout.

The analysis process takes place after acquiring the desired input from stakeholders – studying whether any patterns emerge within this gathered data and cross-referencing them against predetermined standards or milestones. Different cultures and personal feelings should be taken into account in order to properly interpret the results from this analysis & use them accordingly when creating strategies/action plans to improve care services.

To make sure person-centred care is fully provided, it’s essential that those being cared for, plus other relevant parties, are involved in planning these solutions and that any alterations which were made due to feedback gained must remain clear and truthful, without leaving room for misinterpretation.

3.1 Analyse factors that influence the capacity of an individual to express consent.

The power to consent is the ability of a person to comprehend and make informed decisions about their healthcare. Several components can have an impact on one’s capacity for giving approval, such as physical, cognitive, emotional, and social factors.

Physical aspects cover how any physical health problems or disabilities may affect someone’s capability to consent. Someone with severe impairments in movement or communication might find it hard to express permission due to these limitations.

Cognitive variables consider mental wellness issues that could possibly hamper an individual’s decision-making ability when they are asked to give their approval – dementia being a possible example which creates confusion over understanding info correctly whilst depression makes focusing/processing facts harder too.

Emotional reasons take into account psychological stressors like anxiety that influence the process by creating feelings of being overwhelmed or unable to make decisions.

Also, social factors regard the effects of cultural and personal beliefs as well as familial dynamics on an individual’s capacity for consenting; a person may find themselves pushed by family members into making certain choices that go against their preference or influenced heavily by specific values held dearly in their heart which could cloud judgement.

The range of physical, cognitive, emotional and social factors can affect somebody’s power to grant approval and so must be factored in when gaining someone’s agreement concerning care or treatments; providing any necessary assistance is also essential here to ensure everyone involved are comfortable with it all before they commit.

3.3 Explain what steps to take if consent cannot be readily established.

When caring for an individual, determining consent is a vital part of the process. It is important to take into account any physical, cognitive, emotional or social factors that might affect the person’s ability to make well-informed decisions in this regard.

If it cannot be easily established whether or not they are able to provide consent for their care and treatment, appropriate steps should be taken by caregivers to ensure their autonomy and dignity are respected whilst receiving necessary care safely and appropriately.

If a substitute decision-maker needs to provide consent on behalf of the individual due to lack of capacity, then relevant laws must be followed, as well as taking into consideration what best serves them individually, potentially involving legal experts when necessary too.

However, if all other means have been exhausted, such as getting agreement from either source mentioned above or similar considerations, only then may obtaining a court order becomes an option – although always with health and safety being put first whenever possible.

No matter which route is decided upon, making sure individuals remain involved in the decision-making process should be an absolute priority, taking into account cultural and personal sensitivities to create a secure & nurturing atmosphere.

This will also ensure that their autonomy is held in high regard throughout any procedure they might need to undergo or treatment they may receive.

4.1 Describe different ways of applying active participation to meet individual needs.

Active participation is a means of addressing personal needs, allowing individuals to take part in decisions that affect them. It encourages individual development, autonomy and self-determination while offering people the chance to be more involved in their environment and circumstances.

One way this can be achieved is through person-centred planning (PCP). With support from family or friends, an individual creates a plan based on what they want rather than what someone else wants for them, focusing on goals within areas such as healthcare, education/employment and housing options – all with strategies tailored specifically to meet those objectives.

Peer mentoring or coaching programmes are also alternative options: here, two people dealing with similar issues come together, and one acts as a mentor by exchanging skills and experiences – leading towards results neither could achieve alone whilst fostering mutual respect between equals despite any differences in prior knowledge levels.

Self-advocacy also falls under active participation – empowering somebody to stand up for themselves, championing their rights toward respectful treatment alongside the opportunity to make decisions that are in their best interests. Therefore, information and resources for support (such as legal counsel or personal assistance services if necessary) should be accessible to ensure individuals have the freedom of choice without feeling limited.

Active participation is ultimately about encouraging autonomy over one’s life – developing a stronger sense of independence when it comes to decision-making which encourages people to reach their potential with respect intact.

5.4 Describe how to support an individual to question or challenge decisions concerning them that are made by others.

When somebody raises concerns about a decision that has been made about them, it is essential to provide sufficient assistance. There are several steps to be taken in order for this procedure go as smoothly and efficiently as possible.

It is crucial that their rights and desires should be regarded throughout the whole process; thus, all decisions regarding the person ought only to be done with permission from both sides involved while also providing necessary information without any kind of judgment or criticism towards them.

For instance, they can look for specialist advice, such as legal counsels or health-related professionals who comprehend how best to answer their needs when contesting others’ judgments. It might help if family members/friends/advocates discuss various outcomes available prior to making changes which could possibly impact other areas of life, including benefits access etc., preparing individuals emotionally plus practically concerning what could transpire through taking action against another individual’s choice but still keeping its importance untouched either way.

There may come times when getting support services such as mediation or counselling could be beneficial for the individual; although it may not be mandatory in some situations, these can help them to fully understand what happened and examine different methods of reacting fruitfully if they don’t have the ability to solve an issue alone.

It is significant that whenever others make challenging decisions, proper advice should be given with no discrimination whilst listening attentively. This enables individuals to make informed choices based on their values and inclinations without any violation towards their rights or liberty as a mature person living in society.

6.1 Explain the links between identity, self-image and self-esteem.

Identity is an integral component in understanding ourselves, as it encompasses our values and beliefs that form the basis of who we are.

Self-image pertains to how one perceives themselves, including physical traits such as appearance or body image and psychological qualities like personality or behaviour.

Meanwhile, self-esteem gauges a person’s opinion about their worthiness based on both internal and external factors like compliments from others or personal achievements.

It is apparent that identity, self-image, and self-esteem are closely interrelated – a positive outlook on oneself can result in higher confidence which then impacts identity positively, too; however, conversely, if someone lacks assurance in themselves, it could have damaging consequences for both their perception of identity as well as a sense of value they hold within themselves.

To sum up, identity, self-image, and self-esteem are highly entwined concepts that ultimately shape how an individual perceives themselves and their relationships with those around them.

7.1 Compare different uses of risk assessment in care settings

The risk assessment process involves identifying potential risks in a care setting and determining ways to reduce or manage those risks. It is crucial in maintaining the safety, health, and well-being of individuals receiving care. Risk assessments are used in making decisions about service provision, staffing levels, safeguarding procedures, and more.

One application of risk assessment is to identify physical hazards that may lead to injury or harm, such as slippery floors or broken furniture with sharp edges. By conducting regular risk assessments, these hazards can be detected quickly, allowing for appropriate action to be taken before any harm occurs.

Risk assessment also helps in creating protocols for responding to emergency situations, such as medical emergencies and violence/intimidation from service users towards staff members. This helps ensure that individuals are prepared and respond appropriately to unexpected events, even under stress.

Also, risk assessment is used in considering new policies or procedures for providing care services, as well as in reviewing existing ones, to ensure that they are adequate and in line with current best practices. This helps ensure that individuals receive the highest quality of care from competent staff members who have been trained in providing it.

7.2 Explain how risk-taking and risk assessment relate to rights and responsibilities.

Risk assessment is an essential tool used in health and social care settings. Its primary purpose is to identify, evaluate and manage potential risks before they become a reality. This form of analysis helps protect people from physical injury, psychological trauma or loss by highlighting any possible hazards that could occur down the line.

When it comes to clinical decision-making, risk assessments play a pivotal role in informing practitioners about how best to proceed with patient treatment plans. For example, examining medical history records such as test results or imaging reports can help them devise appropriate methods of intervention if needed, while preventive procedures like screenings assist with early identification of issues during routine visits too.

Aside from individual cases, these kinds of analyses are also crucial when creating policies related specifically to areas where risks may exist, e.g., infection control within hospitals or hazardous materials handling at residential facilities etc. These rules not only act as safeguards but also ensure staff members follow the safe practice on daily basis for their patient’s well-being.

Moreover, risk assessments are extremely important for safeguarding vulnerable individuals such as elderly people, children or those with disabilities. It involves constantly monitoring and assessing their circumstances to reduce the chances of them being exposed to any form of harm, abuse or neglect while making sure they’re complying with the prescribed care plan too.

Also, this kind of analysis is beneficial in evaluating financial aspects related to providing healthcare services by estimating costs and verifying that resources have been used in an efficient manner etc. Thus, through a successful risk assessment strategy, providers can not only ensure patient safety but deliver cost-effective treatments as well.

7.3 Explain why risk assessments need to be regularly revised.

Risk assessments in the health and social care fields should be regularly updated for several reasons. One is that an individual’s needs may shift with time, affecting the potential hazards they confront. For example, somebody who could have previously lived on their own might develop a disorder necessitating extra support and supervision; such circumstances would increase risks to them, requiring changes to their existing assessment of risk.

In addition, modern advancements like new medical treatments or assistive technologies can help reduce some perils faced by individuals having certain conditions–this means revised hazard evaluations must consider those breakthroughs, so people receive ideal and efficient treatment plans accordingly.

Also, when laws are altered, it affects risk analyses too since these modifications call for additional precautions protecting individuals’ safety standards; thus, newly implemented regulations require revisions in order for checks to remain up-to-date as well as compliant according to expectations set forth from them.

Therefore, it is crucial that healthcare professionals continue revising evaluation protocols ensuring accuracy while providing the best quality care for those needing support, taking into account alterations that can happen along with the evolution of technology and new laws.


  • Person-centred care. (2017, November 9). Health Education England. Retrieved from https://www.hee.nhs.uk/our-work/person-centred-care
  • T. (2020, January 24). Patient Centered Care & Person Centered Care – What Is it & How Can it Improve Healthcare? Guideway Care. Retrieved from https://guidewaycare.com/what-is-person-centered-care-and-how-can-it-improve-healthcare/
  • American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on Person‐Centered Care, Brummel‐Smith, K., Butler, D., Frieder, M., Gibbs, N., Henry, M., … & Vladeck, B. C. (2016). Person‐centered care: A definition and essential elements. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 64(1), 15-18.
  • Rosemond, C. A. (2009). Implementing person centered care in nursing homes (Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill).
  • Crandall, L. G., White, D. L., Schuldheis, S., & Talerico, K. A. (2007). Initiating person-centered care practices in long-term care facilities. Journal of gerontological nursing, 33(11), 47-56.
  • Zeisel, J. (2013). Improving person-centered care through effective design. Generations, 37(3), 45-52.
  • Burton-Hughes, L. (2018, February 23). Person-Centred Care Guidance. The Hub | High Speed Training. Retrieved from https://www.highspeedtraining.co.uk/hub/what-is-person-centred-care/
  • Coyne, I., Holmström, I., & Söderbäck, M. (2018). Centeredness in healthcare: a concept synthesis of family-centered care, person-centered care and child-centered care. Journal of pediatric nursing, 42, 45-56.
  • Ekman, I., Swedberg, K., Taft, C., Lindseth, A., Norberg, A., Brink, E., … & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2011). Person-centered care—ready for prime time. European journal of cardiovascular nursing, 10(4), 248-251.
  • Stein-Parbury, J., Chenoweth, L., Jeon, Y. H., Brodaty, H., Haas, M., & Norman, R. (2012). Implementing person-centered care in residential dementia care. Clinical gerontologist, 35(5), 404-424.
  • https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.17.0559. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.17.0559
  • Godfrey, M., Young, J., Shannon, R., Skingley, A., Woolley, R., Arrojo, F., Brooker, D., Manley, K., & Surr, C. (2018, June 1). Person-centred care: meaning and practice – The Person, Interactions and Environment Programme to improve care of people with dementia in hospital: a multisite study – NCBI Bookshelf. Person-centred Care: Meaning and Practice – the Person, Interactions and Environment Programme to Improve Care of People With Dementia in Hospital: A Multisite Study – NCBI Bookshelf. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK508103/
  • Ekman, I., Swedberg, K., Taft, C., Lindseth, A., Norberg, A., Brink, E., … & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2011). Person-centered care—ready for prime time. European journal of cardiovascular nursing, 10(4), 248-251.
  • Kuipers, S. J., Cramm, J. M., & Nieboer, A. P. (2019, January 8). The importance of patient-centered care and co-creation of care for satisfaction with care and physical and social well-being of patients with multi-morbidity in the primary care setting – BMC Health Services Research. BioMed Central. Retrieved from https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-018-3818-y


Beat AI detection with ease.

Rewrite or generate new answers that beat AI detection. Register now and get 3,000 AI tokens for free.

Or use coupon NEWUSER20 to get 20% off on any plan.